l’identité des étudiants avec son propre champ d’étude à travers la lecture et l›écriture
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publiée:
juil. 27, 2017
Mots-clés:
acquisition de connaissances en langue, identité des étudiants de psychologie, littératie académique, stage de langue en anglais
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Résumé
Cet article vise à partager les résultats d’une recherche sur l’identité des étudiants comme psychologues à avenir à travers de pratiques académiques littéraires en anglais. L’étude a fourni les étudiants d’un environnement approprié basé sur des sujets à propos de la psyshologie; ce qui a été caractérisé par la libre production des étudiants, ils ont eu l’opportunité de faire leurs propres choix; ainsi que de discuter, analyser, faire des opinions ou diagnostiques sur les sujets lus (annexe 8). Les données ont été recueillis à travers des journaux d’étudiants, échantillons écrits et entretiens semi structurés. Les résultats monstrent l’identité des étudiants avec leur propre champ d’étude tout au long des aspects suivants: les stages de littératie rendent possible la lecture et écriture concernant sujets de la vie quotidienne en partant d’un point de vue critique, ils ont bâti leur identité au travers de l’intérêt d’analyse et en argumentant des situations problématiques; en plus de l’usage de vocabulaire spécialisé, la liaison entre théorie et pratique sont montré dans cet étude.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Comment citer
Arias-Rodríguez, G. L. (2017). l’identité des étudiants avec son propre champ d’étude à travers la lecture et l›écriture. Quaestiones Disputatae: Temas En Debate, 10(20), 164-191. Consulté à l’adresse http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/qdisputatae/article/view/1330
Rubrique
Artículos No 20
De acuerdo a la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Sin Derivar 4.0 Internacional, se autoriza leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar los textos completos de estos artículos, siempre y cuando se conceda el crédito a los autores de los textos y a la Revista Quaestiones Disputatae: temas en debate, como fuente de publicación original. No se permite el uso comercial de copia o distribución de contenidos, así como tampoco la adaptación, derivación o transformación alguna de estos sin la autorización previa de los autores y de la dirección de Quaestiones Disputatae: temas en debate.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Références
Al Azri R. and Al-Rashdi M. (2014). The effect of using authentic materials in teaching. International journal of science and technology research, 3(10), 249-254.
Baleiro, R. (2011). A definition of literacy: a content analysis of literature syllabuses and interviews with Portuguese lectures of literature. The Online of Journal of New Horizons in Education. 1(4). Retrieved form http://www.tojned.net/pdf/tojnedv01i04-02.pdf
Baxter, P. and Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved form http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf
Burns, A. (2003). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Butler, G. (2013). Discipline-specific versus generic academic literacy intervention for university education: An issue of impact?. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 71-87. Retrieved from http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/11598/langt_v47_n2_a5.pdf?sequenc
Budiyanto, S. (2013). Literacy And Language Teaching. Journal Pendidikan IImu Sosial, 23(1), 71- 77. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/USUARIO/Downloads/literacy.pdf
Brown, H. (1994). Teaching by Principles. San Francisco United States: Prentice Hall Regents.
Corbetta, P. (2010). Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. España: Mc Graw-Hill/interamericana. Recuperado de http://diversidadlocal.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/metodologc3ada-y-tc3a9cnicasde-investigacic3b3n-social-piergiorgio-corbetta.pdf
Council of the European Union. (2014). Conclusions on effective teacher Education. Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council Meeting, Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/
en/educ/142690.pdf
Digest, E. (2002). Adolescent literacy and content area reading. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Bloomington IN., Family Learning Association Blooming IN. Retrieved form http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED469930.pdf
Goodman, K. S. (1996). Ken Goodman on reading: A common-sense look at the nature of language and the science of reading. Ontario, Canada: Scholastic.
________ And Goodman, Y. (2014). Making sense of learners making sense of written language. New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=HiOj4TV_3DoC&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&d
Mohite, M. (2014). An Investigation inot the English Language Writing Strategies Used by Polish EFL Secondry School Learners. London, Reino Unido: British Council. Retrieved from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/filefield_paths/an_investigation_into_the_english_language_writing_strategies_v2.pdf
Nadeem, M. (2013). Motivation as a perspective practice in English Language. Teaching at secondary level. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2 (1), 63-69. Retrieved form file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/Dadeem%20motivation%20201.pdf
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson.
PISA (2006). Reading literacy framework. Retrieved form http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/sample_papers/Reading_Framework-en.pdf
Starfield, S. (1994). Cummins, EAP and academic literacy. TESOL Quarterly, 28,176-179.
Taffy E. (2001). Thinking for ourselves: Literacy Learning in a Diverse Teaching Inquire.The reader teacher Network, 54(6), 596-607.
Trede, F., Macklin, R. and Bridges, D. (2011). Professional identity development: a review of the higher education literature. Australia: Charles Sturt university, Routledge.
Turkan, S. Bicknell J. and Croft, A. (2012). Effective practices for developing literacy skills of English language learners in the English language arts classroom. New Jersey: ETS, Princeton.
Xhaferi, B. (2009). Teaching and learning ESP vocabulary. Macedonia: South Eas European University. Retrieved form file:///C:/Users/USUARIO/Downloads/Dialnet-TeachingAndLearni gESPVocabulary-3410918.pdf
Zúñiga, C. (2000). Constructing Literacy from Reading in fist and second language. Neiva, Colombia: Universidad Surcolombiana, Talleres OTI Impresos
Baleiro, R. (2011). A definition of literacy: a content analysis of literature syllabuses and interviews with Portuguese lectures of literature. The Online of Journal of New Horizons in Education. 1(4). Retrieved form http://www.tojned.net/pdf/tojnedv01i04-02.pdf
Baxter, P. and Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved form http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf
Burns, A. (2003). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Butler, G. (2013). Discipline-specific versus generic academic literacy intervention for university education: An issue of impact?. Journal for Language Teaching, 47(2), 71-87. Retrieved from http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/11598/langt_v47_n2_a5.pdf?sequenc
Budiyanto, S. (2013). Literacy And Language Teaching. Journal Pendidikan IImu Sosial, 23(1), 71- 77. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/USUARIO/Downloads/literacy.pdf
Brown, H. (1994). Teaching by Principles. San Francisco United States: Prentice Hall Regents.
Corbetta, P. (2010). Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. España: Mc Graw-Hill/interamericana. Recuperado de http://diversidadlocal.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/metodologc3ada-y-tc3a9cnicasde-investigacic3b3n-social-piergiorgio-corbetta.pdf
Council of the European Union. (2014). Conclusions on effective teacher Education. Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council Meeting, Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/
en/educ/142690.pdf
Digest, E. (2002). Adolescent literacy and content area reading. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Bloomington IN., Family Learning Association Blooming IN. Retrieved form http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED469930.pdf
Goodman, K. S. (1996). Ken Goodman on reading: A common-sense look at the nature of language and the science of reading. Ontario, Canada: Scholastic.
________ And Goodman, Y. (2014). Making sense of learners making sense of written language. New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=HiOj4TV_3DoC&pg=PA17&lpg=PA17&d
Mohite, M. (2014). An Investigation inot the English Language Writing Strategies Used by Polish EFL Secondry School Learners. London, Reino Unido: British Council. Retrieved from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/filefield_paths/an_investigation_into_the_english_language_writing_strategies_v2.pdf
Nadeem, M. (2013). Motivation as a perspective practice in English Language. Teaching at secondary level. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2 (1), 63-69. Retrieved form file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/Dadeem%20motivation%20201.pdf
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson.
PISA (2006). Reading literacy framework. Retrieved form http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/sample_papers/Reading_Framework-en.pdf
Starfield, S. (1994). Cummins, EAP and academic literacy. TESOL Quarterly, 28,176-179.
Taffy E. (2001). Thinking for ourselves: Literacy Learning in a Diverse Teaching Inquire.The reader teacher Network, 54(6), 596-607.
Trede, F., Macklin, R. and Bridges, D. (2011). Professional identity development: a review of the higher education literature. Australia: Charles Sturt university, Routledge.
Turkan, S. Bicknell J. and Croft, A. (2012). Effective practices for developing literacy skills of English language learners in the English language arts classroom. New Jersey: ETS, Princeton.
Xhaferi, B. (2009). Teaching and learning ESP vocabulary. Macedonia: South Eas European University. Retrieved form file:///C:/Users/USUARIO/Downloads/Dialnet-TeachingAndLearni gESPVocabulary-3410918.pdf
Zúñiga, C. (2000). Constructing Literacy from Reading in fist and second language. Neiva, Colombia: Universidad Surcolombiana, Talleres OTI Impresos