Characterization of the operation of a tubular biodigester fed with pig manure in the ecuadorian amazon
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 26, 2021
Keywords:
biogas, anaerobic digestion, swine production, hydraulic retention time
Main Article Content
Abstract
The animal manure waste are today generators of one of the main environmental problems. These are associated with greenhouse gas emissions and high risks of contamination of surface and groundwater, being discharged without any or partial treatment. The purpose of this work was to characterize the operation of a tubular biodigester installed in the Amazonian Research and Postgraduate Center for Conservation (CIPCA) of the Amazon State University, which processes a formed substrate by pig excreta and wastewater. For six weeks, the physical, chemical and microbiological characteristics of the influent and the biodigester effluent were analyzed, where percentages of removal of total solids and volatile solids reached 91%, total nitrogen Kjeldahl 97%, phosphorus 77%, COD 74%, BOD5 57% and total coliforms with 5 logarithmic units. Likewise, the operational parameters of the equipment were calculated determining that the average hydraulic retention time (TRH) of the process is 154 days, which indicates that currently the biodigester works with values above the recommended range for mesophilic conditions (30-60 days), and therefore it is oversized for the average daily substrate load of 51.4 L. This generates that other parameters such as the organic load rate, specific biogas production.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Peñafiel Arcosa, P. A., Collahuaso, E., Pérez Martínez, A., & Diéguez Santanad, K. (2021). Characterization of the operation of a tubular biodigester fed with pig manure in the ecuadorian amazon. Ingenio Magno, 12(1), 6-24. Retrieved from http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/2306
Section
Articulos
DECLARATION OF ORGINIALITY OF SUBMITTED ARTICLE
With this document, I/We certify that the article submitted for possible publication in the institutional journal INGENIO MAGNO of the Research Center Alberto Magno CIIAM of the University Santo Tomás, Tunja campus, is entirely of my(our) own writing, and is a product of my(our) direct intellectual contribution to knowledge.
All data and references to completed publications are duly identified with their respective bibliographical entries and in the citations thus highlighted. If any adjustment or correction is needed, I(we) will contact the journal authorities in advance.
Due to that stated above, I(we) declare that the entirety of the submitted material is in accordance with applicable laws regarding intellectual and industrial property, and therefore, I(we) hold myself(ourselves) responsible for any complaint related to it.
If the submitted article is published, I(we) declare that I(we) fully relinquish publishing rights of the article to the University Santo Tomás, Tunja campus. As remuneration for this relinquishment of rights, I(we) declare my(our) agreement to receive two (2) copies of the edition of the journal in which my(our) article appears.
References
Hu, Y., Cheng, H., & Tao, S. (2017). Environmental and human health challenges of industrial livestock and poultry farming in China and their mitigation. Environment international, 107, 111-130. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.003
Stoddard, E. A., & Hovorka, A. (2019). Animals, vulnerability and global environmental change: The case of farmed pigs in concentrated animal feeding operations in North Carolina. Geoforum, 100, 153-165. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.01.002
Takahashi, Y., Nomura, H., Son, C. T., Kusudo, T., & Yabe, M. (2020). Manure management and pollution levels of contract and non-contract livestock farming in Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment, 710, 136200.
Hadlocon, L., Zhao, L., Bohrer, G., Kenny, W., Garrity, S., Wang, J., . . . Upadhyay, J. (2015). Modeling of particulate matter dispersion from a poultry facility using AERMOD. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(2), 206-217. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.986306.
Arias Martínez, S. A., Betancur Toro, F. M., Gómez Rojas, G., Salazar Giraldo, J. P., & Hernández Ángel, M. L. (2010). Fitorremediación con humedales artificiales para el tratamiento de aguas residuales porcinas. Informador técnico, 74, 12-22.
Quishpe-López, J. D., Lliguicota-Guarquila, J. P., Sarduy-Pereira, L. B., & Diéguez-Santana, K. (2020). La producción más limpia, como estrategia de valorización (ecoeficiencia) del centro de faenamiento, Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 7(3), 59-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2020.007.03.059
Vera-Romero, I., Martínez-Reyes, J., Estrada-Jaramillo, M., & Ortiz-Soriano, A. (2014). Potencial de generación de biogás y energía eléctrica Parte I: excretas de ganado bovino y porcino. Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología, 15(3), 429-436. doi:10.1016/S1405-7743(14)70352-X
Fan, J., Xiao, J., Liu, D., Ye, G., Luo, J., Houlbrooke, D., . . . Tian, J. (2017). Effect of application of dairy manure, effluent and inorganic fertilizer on nitrogen leaching in clayey fluvo-aquic soil: A lysimeter study. Science of the Total Environment, 592, 206-214. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.060
Pinos-Rodríguez, J. M., García-López, J. C., Peña-Avelino, L. Y., Rendón-Huerta, J. A., González González, C., & Tristán-Patiño, F. (2012). Impactos y regulaciones ambientales del estiércol generado por los sistemas ganaderos de algunos países de América. Agrociencia, 46(4), 359-370
Commission, E. (2011). Report from the commission to the Council and the European Parliament on implementation of the Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of water against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources for the period 2004-2007 SEC(2010)118, COM(2007)47 final/2. Retrieved from Brussels: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52010DC0047R%2801%29
Cárdenas, E. V., Maldonado, J. M., Valdez, R. A., Sarduy-Pereira, L. B., & Diéguez-Santana, K. (2019). La producción más limpia en el sector porcino. Una experiencia desde la Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Anales Científicos, 80(1), 76-91. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21704/ac.v80i1.1288
Hien, P. T. T., Preston, T., Lam, V., & Khang, D. N. (2014). Vegetable waste supplemented with human or animal excreta as substrate for biogas production. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 26(10).
Duan, N., Khoshnevisan, B., Lin, C., Liu, Z., & Liu, H. (2020). Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies. Environment international, 137, 105522. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105522
Ramón, A., Romero, F., & Simanca, J. (2013). Diseño de un biodigestor de canecas en serie para obtener gas metano y fertilizantes a partir de la fermentación de excrementos de cerdo. Revista Ambiental agua, aire y suelo, 1(1), 15-23.
Zanabria, J. I. (2019). Evaluación de la calidad de biol de segunda y tercera generación de estiércol de cuy producido en un biodigestor instalado en el instituto regional de la costa de la UNALM. (Opción al Título Profesional de Ingeniero Ambiental ), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Lima, Perú
Pedraza, G., Chará, J., Conde, N., Giraldo, S., & Giraldo, L. (2002). Evaluación de los biodigestores en geomembrana (pvc) y plástico de invernadero en clima medio para el tratamiento de aguas residuales de origen porcino. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 14(1), 2002.
Varnero Moreno, M. T. (2011). Manual de biogas. Santiago de Chile, Chile: MINENERGIA/PNUD/FAO/GEF.
Moncayo Romero, G. (2008). Dimensionamiento, Diseño y Construcción de Biodigestores y Plantas de Biogás: Aqualimpia Beratende Ingenieure.
Duan, N., Zhang, D., Lin, C., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Liu, H., & Liu, Z. (2019). Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of pig manure: Methane production, mass flow, reactor scale and heating scenarios. Journal of environmental management, 231, 646-652. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.062
Salminen, E. A., & Rintala, J. A. (2002). Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid poultry slaughterhouse waste: effect of hydraulic retention time and loading. Water Research, 36(13), 3175-3182. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00010-6
Liu, C.-f., Yuan, X.-z., Zeng, G.-m., Li, W.-w., & Li, J. (2008). Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology, 99(4), 882-888. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.013
Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., & Eaton, A. D. (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd Edition. USA: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation.
Lansing, S., Botero, R. B., & Martin, J. F. (2008). Waste treatment and biogas quality in small-scale agricultural digesters. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5881-5890. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.090
Morgan Jr, H. M., Xie, W., Liang, J., Mao, H., Lei, H., Ruan, R., & Bu, Q. (2018). A techno-economic evaluation of anaerobic biogas producing systems in developing countries. Bioresource Technology, 250, 910-921. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.013
Khan, M. A., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., Liu, Y., Nghiem, L. D., Hai, F. I., . . . Wu, Y. (2016). Optimization of process parameters for production of volatile fatty acid, biohydrogen and methane from anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 219(Supplement C), 738-748. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.073
Garfí, M., Martí-Herrero, J., Garwood, A., & Ferrer, I. (2016). Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 599-614. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071X., & Preston, T. (1999). Gas production from pig manure fed at different loading rates to polyethylene tubular biodigesters. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 11(1).
Martínez Hernández, C. M., & García López, Y. (2016). Use of basic and specific pre-treatments for the biogas production. Revision and analysis. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 25(3), 81-92.
Neshat, S. A., Mohammadi, M., Najafpour, G. D., & Lahijani, P. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 308-322. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137
Arteaga-Pérez, L. E., Segura, C., & Santana, K. D. (2016). Procesos de torrefacción para valorización de residuos lignocelulósicos. Análisis de posibles tecnologías de aplicación en Sudamérica. Afinidad, 73(573), 60-68.
Yilmazel, Y. D., & Demirer, G. N. (2013). Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from anaerobic co-digestion residues of poultry manure and maize silage via struvite precipitation. Waste Management & Research, 31(8), 792-804. doi:10.1177/0734242X13492005
Diéguez-Santana, K., Casas-Ledón, Y., Loureiro Salabarria, J. A., Pérez-Martínez, A., & Arteaga-Pérez, L. E. (2020). A life cycle assessment of bread production: A Cuban case study. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 8(2), 125-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2020.06.002
Taddeo, R., & Lepistö, R. (2015). Struvite precipitation in raw and co-digested swine slurries for nutrients recovery in batch reactors. Water Science and Technology, 71(6), 892-897. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.045 %J Water Science and Technology
Soto-Cabrera, A. I., Panimboza-Ojeda, A. P., Ilibay-Granda, C. G., Valverde-Lara, C. R., & Diéguez-Santana, K. (2020). Impacto ambiental de la operación del Centro de faenamiento de la ciudad de Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador. Prospectiva, 18(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.15665/rp.v18i1.
MAG. (2018). Manual técnico para el registro y control de fertilizantes, enmiendas de suelo y productos afines de uso agrícolas Retrieved from Quito, Ecuador: http://www.agrocalidad.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/Manual-T%C3%A9cnico-para-registro-y-control-fertilizantes-enmiendas-de-suelo-y-productos-afines-de-uso-agr%C3%ADcola-14-12-2018-publicar-web.pdf
Reglamento (UE) 2019/1009 del Parlamento Europeo, 25.6.2019 C.F.R. (2019).
Martí-Herrero, J., Alvarez, R., Cespedes, R., Rojas, M. R., Conde, V., Aliaga, L., . . . Danov, S. (2015). Cow, sheep and llama manure at psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion with low cost tubular digesters in cold climate and high altitude. Bioresource Technology, 181, 238-246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.063
Wijesinghe, D. T. N. (2017). Enhancement of methane generation by reducing nitrogen concentration during anaerobic digestion of swine manure. (Doctor of Philosophy), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/197463Ferrer, I., Garfí, M., Uggetti, E., Ferrer-Martí, L., Calderon, A., & Velo, E. (2011). Biogas production in low-cost household digesters at the Peruvian Andes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(5), 1668-1674. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.036
Garfí, M., Ferrer-Martí, L., Perez, I., Flotats, X., & Ferrer, I. (2011). Codigestion of cow and guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. Ecological Engineering, 37(12), 2066-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.018
Hadlocon, L., Zhao, L., Bohrer, G., Kenny, W., Garrity, S., Wang, J., . . . Upadhyay, J. (2015). Modeling of particulate matter dispersion from a poultry facility using AERMOD. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(2), 206-217. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.986306
MAE. (2015). Acuerdo Ministerial 097-A. Reforma Texto Unificado Legislación Secundaria, Medio Ambiente, Libro VI. Quito, Ecuador Retrieved from http://www.ambiente.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2018/05/Acuerdo-097.pdf
Pu, Q., Zhao, L.-X., Li, Y.-T., & Su, J.-Q. (2020). Manure fertilization increase antibiotic resistance in soils from typical greenhouse vegetable production bases, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 391, 122267. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122267
Torrella, S. B. (2008). Para una correcta selección y explotación de digestores anaerobios. Revista de producción animal, 20(2), 102-110.
Van Doren, L. G., Posmanik, R., Bicalho, F. A., Tester, J. W., & Sills, D. L. (2017). Prospects for energy recovery during hydrothermal and biological processing of waste biomass. Bioresource Technology, 225, 67-74. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.030
Stoddard, E. A., & Hovorka, A. (2019). Animals, vulnerability and global environmental change: The case of farmed pigs in concentrated animal feeding operations in North Carolina. Geoforum, 100, 153-165. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.01.002
Takahashi, Y., Nomura, H., Son, C. T., Kusudo, T., & Yabe, M. (2020). Manure management and pollution levels of contract and non-contract livestock farming in Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment, 710, 136200.
Hadlocon, L., Zhao, L., Bohrer, G., Kenny, W., Garrity, S., Wang, J., . . . Upadhyay, J. (2015). Modeling of particulate matter dispersion from a poultry facility using AERMOD. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(2), 206-217. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.986306.
Arias Martínez, S. A., Betancur Toro, F. M., Gómez Rojas, G., Salazar Giraldo, J. P., & Hernández Ángel, M. L. (2010). Fitorremediación con humedales artificiales para el tratamiento de aguas residuales porcinas. Informador técnico, 74, 12-22.
Quishpe-López, J. D., Lliguicota-Guarquila, J. P., Sarduy-Pereira, L. B., & Diéguez-Santana, K. (2020). La producción más limpia, como estrategia de valorización (ecoeficiencia) del centro de faenamiento, Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador. Revista Científica de la UCSA, 7(3), 59-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18004/ucsa/2409-8752/2020.007.03.059
Vera-Romero, I., Martínez-Reyes, J., Estrada-Jaramillo, M., & Ortiz-Soriano, A. (2014). Potencial de generación de biogás y energía eléctrica Parte I: excretas de ganado bovino y porcino. Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología, 15(3), 429-436. doi:10.1016/S1405-7743(14)70352-X
Fan, J., Xiao, J., Liu, D., Ye, G., Luo, J., Houlbrooke, D., . . . Tian, J. (2017). Effect of application of dairy manure, effluent and inorganic fertilizer on nitrogen leaching in clayey fluvo-aquic soil: A lysimeter study. Science of the Total Environment, 592, 206-214. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.060
Pinos-Rodríguez, J. M., García-López, J. C., Peña-Avelino, L. Y., Rendón-Huerta, J. A., González González, C., & Tristán-Patiño, F. (2012). Impactos y regulaciones ambientales del estiércol generado por los sistemas ganaderos de algunos países de América. Agrociencia, 46(4), 359-370
Commission, E. (2011). Report from the commission to the Council and the European Parliament on implementation of the Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of water against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources for the period 2004-2007 SEC(2010)118, COM(2007)47 final/2. Retrieved from Brussels: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52010DC0047R%2801%29
Cárdenas, E. V., Maldonado, J. M., Valdez, R. A., Sarduy-Pereira, L. B., & Diéguez-Santana, K. (2019). La producción más limpia en el sector porcino. Una experiencia desde la Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Anales Científicos, 80(1), 76-91. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21704/ac.v80i1.1288
Hien, P. T. T., Preston, T., Lam, V., & Khang, D. N. (2014). Vegetable waste supplemented with human or animal excreta as substrate for biogas production. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 26(10).
Duan, N., Khoshnevisan, B., Lin, C., Liu, Z., & Liu, H. (2020). Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies. Environment international, 137, 105522. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105522
Ramón, A., Romero, F., & Simanca, J. (2013). Diseño de un biodigestor de canecas en serie para obtener gas metano y fertilizantes a partir de la fermentación de excrementos de cerdo. Revista Ambiental agua, aire y suelo, 1(1), 15-23.
Zanabria, J. I. (2019). Evaluación de la calidad de biol de segunda y tercera generación de estiércol de cuy producido en un biodigestor instalado en el instituto regional de la costa de la UNALM. (Opción al Título Profesional de Ingeniero Ambiental ), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Lima, Perú
Pedraza, G., Chará, J., Conde, N., Giraldo, S., & Giraldo, L. (2002). Evaluación de los biodigestores en geomembrana (pvc) y plástico de invernadero en clima medio para el tratamiento de aguas residuales de origen porcino. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 14(1), 2002.
Varnero Moreno, M. T. (2011). Manual de biogas. Santiago de Chile, Chile: MINENERGIA/PNUD/FAO/GEF.
Moncayo Romero, G. (2008). Dimensionamiento, Diseño y Construcción de Biodigestores y Plantas de Biogás: Aqualimpia Beratende Ingenieure.
Duan, N., Zhang, D., Lin, C., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Liu, H., & Liu, Z. (2019). Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of pig manure: Methane production, mass flow, reactor scale and heating scenarios. Journal of environmental management, 231, 646-652. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.062
Salminen, E. A., & Rintala, J. A. (2002). Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid poultry slaughterhouse waste: effect of hydraulic retention time and loading. Water Research, 36(13), 3175-3182. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00010-6
Liu, C.-f., Yuan, X.-z., Zeng, G.-m., Li, W.-w., & Li, J. (2008). Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology, 99(4), 882-888. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.013
Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., & Eaton, A. D. (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd Edition. USA: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation.
Lansing, S., Botero, R. B., & Martin, J. F. (2008). Waste treatment and biogas quality in small-scale agricultural digesters. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5881-5890. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.090
Morgan Jr, H. M., Xie, W., Liang, J., Mao, H., Lei, H., Ruan, R., & Bu, Q. (2018). A techno-economic evaluation of anaerobic biogas producing systems in developing countries. Bioresource Technology, 250, 910-921. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.013
Khan, M. A., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., Liu, Y., Nghiem, L. D., Hai, F. I., . . . Wu, Y. (2016). Optimization of process parameters for production of volatile fatty acid, biohydrogen and methane from anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 219(Supplement C), 738-748. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.073
Garfí, M., Martí-Herrero, J., Garwood, A., & Ferrer, I. (2016). Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 599-614. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071X., & Preston, T. (1999). Gas production from pig manure fed at different loading rates to polyethylene tubular biodigesters. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 11(1).
Martínez Hernández, C. M., & García López, Y. (2016). Use of basic and specific pre-treatments for the biogas production. Revision and analysis. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 25(3), 81-92.
Neshat, S. A., Mohammadi, M., Najafpour, G. D., & Lahijani, P. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 308-322. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137
Arteaga-Pérez, L. E., Segura, C., & Santana, K. D. (2016). Procesos de torrefacción para valorización de residuos lignocelulósicos. Análisis de posibles tecnologías de aplicación en Sudamérica. Afinidad, 73(573), 60-68.
Yilmazel, Y. D., & Demirer, G. N. (2013). Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from anaerobic co-digestion residues of poultry manure and maize silage via struvite precipitation. Waste Management & Research, 31(8), 792-804. doi:10.1177/0734242X13492005
Diéguez-Santana, K., Casas-Ledón, Y., Loureiro Salabarria, J. A., Pérez-Martínez, A., & Arteaga-Pérez, L. E. (2020). A life cycle assessment of bread production: A Cuban case study. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 8(2), 125-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2020.06.002
Taddeo, R., & Lepistö, R. (2015). Struvite precipitation in raw and co-digested swine slurries for nutrients recovery in batch reactors. Water Science and Technology, 71(6), 892-897. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.045 %J Water Science and Technology
Soto-Cabrera, A. I., Panimboza-Ojeda, A. P., Ilibay-Granda, C. G., Valverde-Lara, C. R., & Diéguez-Santana, K. (2020). Impacto ambiental de la operación del Centro de faenamiento de la ciudad de Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador. Prospectiva, 18(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.15665/rp.v18i1.
MAG. (2018). Manual técnico para el registro y control de fertilizantes, enmiendas de suelo y productos afines de uso agrícolas Retrieved from Quito, Ecuador: http://www.agrocalidad.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/Manual-T%C3%A9cnico-para-registro-y-control-fertilizantes-enmiendas-de-suelo-y-productos-afines-de-uso-agr%C3%ADcola-14-12-2018-publicar-web.pdf
Reglamento (UE) 2019/1009 del Parlamento Europeo, 25.6.2019 C.F.R. (2019).
Martí-Herrero, J., Alvarez, R., Cespedes, R., Rojas, M. R., Conde, V., Aliaga, L., . . . Danov, S. (2015). Cow, sheep and llama manure at psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion with low cost tubular digesters in cold climate and high altitude. Bioresource Technology, 181, 238-246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.063
Wijesinghe, D. T. N. (2017). Enhancement of methane generation by reducing nitrogen concentration during anaerobic digestion of swine manure. (Doctor of Philosophy), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/197463Ferrer, I., Garfí, M., Uggetti, E., Ferrer-Martí, L., Calderon, A., & Velo, E. (2011). Biogas production in low-cost household digesters at the Peruvian Andes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(5), 1668-1674. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.036
Garfí, M., Ferrer-Martí, L., Perez, I., Flotats, X., & Ferrer, I. (2011). Codigestion of cow and guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. Ecological Engineering, 37(12), 2066-2070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.018
Hadlocon, L., Zhao, L., Bohrer, G., Kenny, W., Garrity, S., Wang, J., . . . Upadhyay, J. (2015). Modeling of particulate matter dispersion from a poultry facility using AERMOD. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(2), 206-217. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.986306
MAE. (2015). Acuerdo Ministerial 097-A. Reforma Texto Unificado Legislación Secundaria, Medio Ambiente, Libro VI. Quito, Ecuador Retrieved from http://www.ambiente.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2018/05/Acuerdo-097.pdf
Pu, Q., Zhao, L.-X., Li, Y.-T., & Su, J.-Q. (2020). Manure fertilization increase antibiotic resistance in soils from typical greenhouse vegetable production bases, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 391, 122267. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122267
Torrella, S. B. (2008). Para una correcta selección y explotación de digestores anaerobios. Revista de producción animal, 20(2), 102-110.
Van Doren, L. G., Posmanik, R., Bicalho, F. A., Tester, J. W., & Sills, D. L. (2017). Prospects for energy recovery during hydrothermal and biological processing of waste biomass. Bioresource Technology, 225, 67-74. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.030