Comparative analysis of the methodologies in information architecture applied to a business context
Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 29, 2016
Keywords:
business architecture, architecture framework, business
Main Article Content
Abstract
Everyday diverse companies in the word, regardless of their size, economic activity, or capital managed, invest large sums of money in technology to meet the specific needs of a certain area determined by the company. This causes data disintegration, redundancy, as well as generating operation, integration, and standardization costs. Additionally, companies cannot count on daily updated and consolidated information. Because of this, it has become increasingly relevant to have a method based on an integral view of the company. This method would allow the alignment of processes, data application, and technological infrastructure with the strategic objectives or purpose of the company in mind. In this way, the correct alignment of technology and business processes can be guaranteed with the purpose of reaching the company’s strategic goals. All of this can be achieved if the company counts on Business Information Architecture which satisfies these requirements. Therefore, this article presents a comparison between different information architecture models and the criteria necessary to develop and implement these methods within an organization.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Duarte-Acosta, N., Bareño-Gutiérrez, R., & Forero-Páez, N. (2016). Comparative analysis of the methodologies in information architecture applied to a business context. Ingenio Magno, 7(1), 32-44. Retrieved from http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/ingeniomagno/article/view/1165
Section
Artículos Vol. 7-1
DECLARATION OF ORGINIALITY OF SUBMITTED ARTICLE
With this document, I/We certify that the article submitted for possible publication in the institutional journal INGENIO MAGNO of the Research Center Alberto Magno CIIAM of the University Santo Tomás, Tunja campus, is entirely of my(our) own writing, and is a product of my(our) direct intellectual contribution to knowledge.
All data and references to completed publications are duly identified with their respective bibliographical entries and in the citations thus highlighted. If any adjustment or correction is needed, I(we) will contact the journal authorities in advance.
Due to that stated above, I(we) declare that the entirety of the submitted material is in accordance with applicable laws regarding intellectual and industrial property, and therefore, I(we) hold myself(ourselves) responsible for any complaint related to it.
If the submitted article is published, I(we) declare that I(we) fully relinquish publishing rights of the article to the University Santo Tomás, Tunja campus. As remuneration for this relinquishment of rights, I(we) declare my(our) agreement to receive two (2) copies of the edition of the journal in which my(our) article appears.
References
Arango-Serna, M. D., Branch-Bedoya, J. W. y LondoñoSalazar, J. E. (2014). Enterprise architecture as tool for managing operational complexity in organizations. Dyna, 81.
Baeza-Yates, R., Loaiza, C. R. y Martín, J. V. (2004). Arquitectura de la información y usabilidad en la web. El Profesional de la información, 13(3), 168-178.
Buckl, S., Ernst, A. M., Matthes, F., Ramacher, R. y Schweda, C. M. (2009). Using enterprise architecture management patterns to complement TOGAF. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2009. Doi: 10.1109/EDOC.2009.30
Chaczko, Z., Kohli, A. S., Klempous, R. y Nikodem, J. (2010). Middleware integration model for smart hospital system using the open group architecture framework (TOGAF). 14th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), 2010 (pp. 215-220). Doi: 10.1109/INES.2010.5483846
De Pablos, C. y Montero, A. (2010). Relación de la arquitectura de la tecnología de información con la estructura organizativa en el sector asegurador. Dirección y Organización, 22, 122-130.
Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H. y Quartel, D. (2011). ArchiMate® extension for modeling and managing motivation, principles, and requirements in TOGAF®. Recuperado de http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/ archimate2-doc/chap10.html.
Epstein, P. (2012). Weeds bring desease to the east African watarways. Lancet, 351(9102).
Esmaeil-Zadeh, M., Millar, G. y Lewis, E. (2012). Mapping the Enterprise Architecture Principles in TOGAF to the Cybernetic Concepts: An Exploratory Study. Recuperado de https://www.computer.org/csdl/ proceedings/hicss/2012/4525/00/4525e270.pdf
Fernández Hernández, A. (2009). Arquitectura de información de los portales intranets: un componente esencial de la gestión de información en las universidades. Acimed, 19(4).
Gerber, A., Kotzé, P. y Van der Merwe, A. (2010). Towards the formalisation of the TOGAF Content Metamodel using ontologies. Recuperado de https:// goo.gl/Nvz1HU
Harrison, R. (2013). TOGAF® 9 Foundation Study Guide. Zaltbommel: Van Haren.
Jonkers, H., Proper, E. y Turner, M. (2009). TOGAF 9 and ArchiMate 1.0. San Francisco: The Open Group.
Jonkers, H., Van den Berg, H., Iacob, M. E., y Quartel, D. (2010). ArchiMate® Extension for Modeling the TOGAF™ Implementation and Migration Phases. White Paper. San Francisco: The Open Group.
Josey, A. (2011). TOGAF® Version 9.1 A Pocket Guide. Zaltbommel: Van Haren.
Lankhorst, M. y Van Drunen, H. (2007). Enterprise architecture development and modelling. Combining TOGAF and ArchiMate. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/ IphJ4l
Laudon, K. C. y Laudon, J. P. (2004). Sistemas de información gerencial: administración de la empresa digital. Ciudad de México: Pearson.
Maya, E. (2010). Arquitectura empresarial: un nuevo reto para las empresas de hoy. Recuperado de http://www. academia.edu/15157112/arquitectura_empresarial_ un_nuevo
Mueller, T., Schuldt, D., Sewald, B., Morisse, M. y Petrikina, J. (2013). Towards inter-organizational enterprise architecture management-applicability of TOGAF 9.1 for network organizations. Recuperado de http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2013/GlobalIssues/ GeneralPresentations/1/
Pérez-Montoro, M. (2010). Arquitectura de la información en entornos web. El profesional de la Información, 19(4), 333-338.
Raynard, B. (2008). TOGAF The Open Group Architecture framework 100 success secrets-100 most asked questions: the missing TOGAF guide on how to achieve and then sustain superior enterprise architecture execution. San Francisco: Emereo.
Rodríguez, L. V. D. (2013). Gestión del conocimiento y tecnología de información y comunicaciones. Revista EAN, 58, 41-60.
Serna, M. D. A., Salazar, J. E. L. y Cortés, J. A. Z. (2010). Arquitectura empresarial, una visión general. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, 9(16), 101-111.
Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison of the top four enterprise architecture methodologies. Recuperado de https://msdn.microsoft.com/en us/library/bb466232.aspx
Vargas, A., Boza, A. y Cuenca, L. (2011). Lograr la alineación estratégica de negocio y las tecnologías de la información a través de Arquitecturas Empresariales: revisión de la Literatura. V International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management (pp. 1061-1070). Recuperado de http://adingor.es/congresos/web/uploads/cio/cio2011/sistemas_de_ informacion/1061-1070.pdf
Vicente, M., Gama, N. y Da Silva, M. M. (2013). Using archiMate and TOGAF to understand the enterprise architecture and ITIL relationship. En Advanced information systems engineering workshops (pp. 134145). Berlín: Springer.
Zachman, J. (2002). The Zachman framework for enterprise architecture. Recuperado de http://www.businessrulesgroup.org/BRWG_RFI/
ZachmanBookRFIextract.pdf
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276-292.
Zachman, J. A. (1999). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 38(2-3), 454-470.
Zachman, J. P. (2009). The Zachman framework evolution. Recuperado de https://www.zachman.com/eaarticles-reference/54-the-zachman-framework-evolution
Zadeh, M. E., Millar, G. y Lewis, E. (2012,). Mapping the enterprise architecture principles in TOGAF to the cybernetic concepts: an exploratory study. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) (pp. 4270-4276). Doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.422
Baeza-Yates, R., Loaiza, C. R. y Martín, J. V. (2004). Arquitectura de la información y usabilidad en la web. El Profesional de la información, 13(3), 168-178.
Buckl, S., Ernst, A. M., Matthes, F., Ramacher, R. y Schweda, C. M. (2009). Using enterprise architecture management patterns to complement TOGAF. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2009. Doi: 10.1109/EDOC.2009.30
Chaczko, Z., Kohli, A. S., Klempous, R. y Nikodem, J. (2010). Middleware integration model for smart hospital system using the open group architecture framework (TOGAF). 14th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), 2010 (pp. 215-220). Doi: 10.1109/INES.2010.5483846
De Pablos, C. y Montero, A. (2010). Relación de la arquitectura de la tecnología de información con la estructura organizativa en el sector asegurador. Dirección y Organización, 22, 122-130.
Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H. y Quartel, D. (2011). ArchiMate® extension for modeling and managing motivation, principles, and requirements in TOGAF®. Recuperado de http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/ archimate2-doc/chap10.html.
Epstein, P. (2012). Weeds bring desease to the east African watarways. Lancet, 351(9102).
Esmaeil-Zadeh, M., Millar, G. y Lewis, E. (2012). Mapping the Enterprise Architecture Principles in TOGAF to the Cybernetic Concepts: An Exploratory Study. Recuperado de https://www.computer.org/csdl/ proceedings/hicss/2012/4525/00/4525e270.pdf
Fernández Hernández, A. (2009). Arquitectura de información de los portales intranets: un componente esencial de la gestión de información en las universidades. Acimed, 19(4).
Gerber, A., Kotzé, P. y Van der Merwe, A. (2010). Towards the formalisation of the TOGAF Content Metamodel using ontologies. Recuperado de https:// goo.gl/Nvz1HU
Harrison, R. (2013). TOGAF® 9 Foundation Study Guide. Zaltbommel: Van Haren.
Jonkers, H., Proper, E. y Turner, M. (2009). TOGAF 9 and ArchiMate 1.0. San Francisco: The Open Group.
Jonkers, H., Van den Berg, H., Iacob, M. E., y Quartel, D. (2010). ArchiMate® Extension for Modeling the TOGAF™ Implementation and Migration Phases. White Paper. San Francisco: The Open Group.
Josey, A. (2011). TOGAF® Version 9.1 A Pocket Guide. Zaltbommel: Van Haren.
Lankhorst, M. y Van Drunen, H. (2007). Enterprise architecture development and modelling. Combining TOGAF and ArchiMate. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/ IphJ4l
Laudon, K. C. y Laudon, J. P. (2004). Sistemas de información gerencial: administración de la empresa digital. Ciudad de México: Pearson.
Maya, E. (2010). Arquitectura empresarial: un nuevo reto para las empresas de hoy. Recuperado de http://www. academia.edu/15157112/arquitectura_empresarial_ un_nuevo
Mueller, T., Schuldt, D., Sewald, B., Morisse, M. y Petrikina, J. (2013). Towards inter-organizational enterprise architecture management-applicability of TOGAF 9.1 for network organizations. Recuperado de http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2013/GlobalIssues/ GeneralPresentations/1/
Pérez-Montoro, M. (2010). Arquitectura de la información en entornos web. El profesional de la Información, 19(4), 333-338.
Raynard, B. (2008). TOGAF The Open Group Architecture framework 100 success secrets-100 most asked questions: the missing TOGAF guide on how to achieve and then sustain superior enterprise architecture execution. San Francisco: Emereo.
Rodríguez, L. V. D. (2013). Gestión del conocimiento y tecnología de información y comunicaciones. Revista EAN, 58, 41-60.
Serna, M. D. A., Salazar, J. E. L. y Cortés, J. A. Z. (2010). Arquitectura empresarial, una visión general. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, 9(16), 101-111.
Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison of the top four enterprise architecture methodologies. Recuperado de https://msdn.microsoft.com/en us/library/bb466232.aspx
Vargas, A., Boza, A. y Cuenca, L. (2011). Lograr la alineación estratégica de negocio y las tecnologías de la información a través de Arquitecturas Empresariales: revisión de la Literatura. V International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management (pp. 1061-1070). Recuperado de http://adingor.es/congresos/web/uploads/cio/cio2011/sistemas_de_ informacion/1061-1070.pdf
Vicente, M., Gama, N. y Da Silva, M. M. (2013). Using archiMate and TOGAF to understand the enterprise architecture and ITIL relationship. En Advanced information systems engineering workshops (pp. 134145). Berlín: Springer.
Zachman, J. (2002). The Zachman framework for enterprise architecture. Recuperado de http://www.businessrulesgroup.org/BRWG_RFI/
ZachmanBookRFIextract.pdf
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276-292.
Zachman, J. A. (1999). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 38(2-3), 454-470.
Zachman, J. P. (2009). The Zachman framework evolution. Recuperado de https://www.zachman.com/eaarticles-reference/54-the-zachman-framework-evolution
Zadeh, M. E., Millar, G. y Lewis, E. (2012,). Mapping the enterprise architecture principles in TOGAF to the cybernetic concepts: an exploratory study. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) (pp. 4270-4276). Doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.422