Mejorando las habilidades de comprensión lectura de un texto de ficción usando mapas mentales en una clase de idioma extranjero en el grado décimo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Muchos estudiantes de idiomas poseen dificultades cuando realizan actividades de comprensión de lectura, lo que da lugar a resultados escolares deficientes. Por lo tanto, este estudio tiene como objetivo ayudar a los estudiantes del grado décimo en un colegio público ubicado en Santander a mejorar sus habilidades de comprensión de lectura sobre un texto de ficción corto usando mapas mentales como estrategia de aprendizaje y al mismo ayudarles a convertirse en estudiantes independientes y autónomos. Una Pre y Post prueba, así como también las notas de campo fueron usadas para analizar el uso de mapas mentales y de esta manera demostrar comprensión de un texto corto de ficción. Los resultados de este estudio indican que los estudiantes se beneficiaron de la modelación de los mapas mentales por parte del profesor ya que los estudiantes lograron entender el texto y añadir más información a sus mapas mentales después de la intervención. Adicionalmente, la evidencia indica que los mapas mentales beneficiaron a un estudiante con dificultades de aprendizaje a mejorar su vocabulario y sus habilidades de comprensión de lectura de un texto corto.
Detalles del artículo
Cómo citar
Gómez-Pereira, D., & Villarreal Manotas, W. (2020). Mejorando las habilidades de comprensión lectura de un texto de ficción usando mapas mentales en una clase de idioma extranjero en el grado décimo. Shimmering Words: Research and Pedagogy E-Journal, 9, 62-97. Recuperado a partir de http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/shimmering/article/view/1989
Sección
Artículos-9
Citas
Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical Knowledge Display-Mind Mapping and Concept Mapping as Efficient Tools in Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Review, 16. REtrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228703184_Graphical_Knowledge_Display-Mind_Mapping_and_Concept_Mapping_as_Efficient_Tools_in_Mathematics_Education
Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind Maps As Classroom Exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46
Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind Mapping Technique in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 215–218. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.010
Buzan, T. (2006). Mind Mapping. BBC Active.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=EbogAQAAQBAJ
Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225631292_Concept_Mapping_Mind_Mapping_and_Argument_Mapping_What_are_the_Differences_and_Do_They_Matter
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press, 1994.
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the `mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x
Fun, C. S., & Maskat, N. (2010). Teacher-Centered Mind Mapping vs Student-Centered Mind Mapping in the teaching of accounting at Pre-U level- An action research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 240–246. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.034
Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2008). Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? Instructional Science, 36(1), 53–73. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/17358381/Concept_mapping_as_a_follow up_strategy_to_learning_from_texts_what_characterizes_good_and_poor_mappers
Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2012). Spontaneous Mind Map Use and Learning from Texts: The Role of Instruction and Student Characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 1387–1394. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.077
Nassaji, H. (2011). Issues in Second-Language Reading: Implications for Acquisition and Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 173–184. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41203420
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: a textbook for teachers. Prentice-Hall.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Newbury House Publisher.
Oxford, R L. (2013). Teaching & Researching: Language Learning Strategies. Taylor & Francis.
Oxford, Rebecca L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167–180. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000492
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Social and Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language : an overview, 31(2011), 73–81. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019
Rosciano, A. (2015). The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(2), Retrieved from: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.01.003
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 15–30.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Taylor & Francis.
Zare, P. (2012). Language Learning Strategies Among EFL / ESL Learners : A Review of Literature, 2(5), 162–169.
Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive strategies as points in teaching reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228(June), 593–600. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.091
Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind Maps As Classroom Exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46
Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind Mapping Technique in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 215–218. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.010
Buzan, T. (2006). Mind Mapping. BBC Active.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?id=EbogAQAAQBAJ
Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225631292_Concept_Mapping_Mind_Mapping_and_Argument_Mapping_What_are_the_Differences_and_Do_They_Matter
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press, 1994.
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the `mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x
Fun, C. S., & Maskat, N. (2010). Teacher-Centered Mind Mapping vs Student-Centered Mind Mapping in the teaching of accounting at Pre-U level- An action research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 240–246. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.034
Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2008). Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: what characterizes good and poor mappers? Instructional Science, 36(1), 53–73. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/17358381/Concept_mapping_as_a_follow up_strategy_to_learning_from_texts_what_characterizes_good_and_poor_mappers
Merchie, E., & Van Keer, H. (2012). Spontaneous Mind Map Use and Learning from Texts: The Role of Instruction and Student Characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 1387–1394. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.077
Nassaji, H. (2011). Issues in Second-Language Reading: Implications for Acquisition and Instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 173–184. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41203420
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: a textbook for teachers. Prentice-Hall.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Newbury House Publisher.
Oxford, R L. (2013). Teaching & Researching: Language Learning Strategies. Taylor & Francis.
Oxford, Rebecca L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167–180. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000492
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Social and Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language : an overview, 31(2011), 73–81. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019
Rosciano, A. (2015). The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(2), Retrieved from: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.01.003
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 15–30.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Taylor & Francis.
Zare, P. (2012). Language Learning Strategies Among EFL / ESL Learners : A Review of Literature, 2(5), 162–169.
Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive strategies as points in teaching reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228(June), 593–600. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.091